freenode #wikipedia

2008-02-02 20:37 < loader> For now it seem like I hate Natasha Galkina
2008-02-02 20:37 < NCC-1701-E> hello Kstigarbha
2008-02-02 20:37 < NCC-1701-E> hello Ashfire
2008-02-02 20:37 < quanticle> loader: Who?
2008-02-02 20:37 < Ashfire> hi
2008-02-02 20:38 < loader> ahh one man asked me to translate article into russian
2008-02-02 20:38 < loader> i did
2008-02-02 20:38 < loader> but admins didn't like them and now i'm to improve this article
2008-02-02 20:39 < loader> or they will delete it
2008-02-02 20:39 < Mike_H> that "one man" is me
2008-02-02 20:39 < loader> yep
2008-02-02 20:39 < loader> ))
2008-02-02 20:39 < Mike_H> quanticle: Natasha was the runner-up on America's Next Top Model, and has started her own modeling career in Milan now
2008-02-02 20:39 < loader> i have added references
2008-02-02 20:39 < Mike_H> and they think she doesn't fit the BIO requirements, despite making a career for herself outside of a television show.
2008-02-02 20:40 < Mike_H> I was actually rather rudely talked to "how did you know what this said in Russian?"
2008-02-02 20:40 < loader> actually she do fit
2008-02-02 20:40 < Mike_H> like they were talking about secrets or something
2008-02-02 20:40 < loader> I have checked terms
2008-02-02 20:40 < Mike_H> I told him rather not nicely that how I found out what things mean in English are not any of his concern
2008-02-02 20:40 < Mike_H> but then I told him anyway
2008-02-02 20:41 < Kstigarbha> hi
2008-02-02 20:41 < loader> hi
2008-02-02 20:41 < NCC-1701-E> hello Adrenalin`
2008-02-02 20:44 < bumm13> hiya Mike_H
2008-02-02 20:46 < loader> I have added one more comment
2008-02-02 20:46 < loader> maybe all will be ok
2008-02-02 20:46 < DannyLilithborne> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zues_yomama
2008-02-02 20:46 < Gracenotes> allo, Mike_H, long-ish time no see
2008-02-02 20:46 < DannyLilithborne> is this appropriate? mainly the part where he gives away his runescape password
2008-02-02 20:53 < gurch> lol runescape
2008-02-02 20:53 < Sfan00> DannyLilthbone
2008-02-02 20:54 < Sfan00> Spam?
2008-02-02 20:54 < Sfan00> Re the user page?
2008-02-02 20:55 * brown_cat rolls around with some yarn
2008-02-02 20:55 < Sfan00> Incidentally, I am hearing the Sperbowl is soon?
2008-02-02 20:56 < Sfan00> Any idea on who the teams are this year?
2008-02-02 20:56 < brown_cat> new york knights and the utah generals
2008-02-02 20:57 < quanticle> Sfan00: I don't know about that.
2008-02-02 20:57 < Sfan00> Thank you
2008-02-02 20:57 < Sfan00> :)
2008-02-02 20:57 < Sfan00> Anyone going to the game?
2008-02-02 20:57 < quanticle> WTF?! Runescape has SOUND now?!
2008-02-02 20:58 * brown_cat gasps
2008-02-02 20:58 < brown_cat> the development
2008-02-02 20:58 < Sfan00> I need to sleep
2008-02-02 20:58 < Sfan00> :(
2008-02-02 20:58 < DannyLilithborne> Sfan00: not really spam, although it is spammish
2008-02-02 20:58 < quanticle> Startled the hell out of me when I loaded the link in the background
2008-02-02 20:58 < DannyLilithborne> i mean the giving away the password bit
2008-02-02 20:58 < Sfan00> Been trying to code 3D stuff
2008-02-02 20:58 < Sfan00> DannyLilthBorne: "Wikipedia does not assit violation of other sites ToS?"
2008-02-02 20:59 < Sfan00> *assist?
2008-02-02 20:59 < quanticle> DannyLilithborne: I don't think that it qualifies as spam, but it is kinda questionable.
2008-02-02 20:59 < Sfan00> I am sure password sharing is aganist most Terms of Service
2008-02-02 20:59 < kylu> wp:iar, delete the thing
2008-02-02 20:59 < quanticle> Sfan00: Is that really in our rules?
2008-02-02 21:00 < Sfan00> quanticle: Kind of
2008-02-02 21:01 < DannyLilithborne> shrugs
2008-02-02 21:01 < DannyLilithborne> just a thought
2008-02-02 21:01 < DannyLilithborne> is there a speedy catgory for non-notable books?
2008-02-02 21:02 < Nakon> DannyLilithborne: generic A7
2008-02-02 21:03 < quanticle> Heh. The Runescape account and password works!
2008-02-02 21:04 < bumm13> :p
2008-02-02 21:04 < Darksun> I don't think there's such thing as 'generic A7'
2008-02-02 21:04 < Nakon> Darksun: on the deletion dropdown, use "A7 other"
2008-02-02 21:04 < quanticle> Color me surprised.
2008-02-02 21:04 < Darksun> Nakon, "A7 applies only to articles about web content or articles on people and organizations themselves, not articles on their books, albums, software and so on. Other article types are not eligible for deletion by this criterion."
2008-02-02 21:05 < Darksun> From [[WP:CSD]]
2008-02-02 21:05 < brown_cat> brb
2008-02-02 21:07 < Darksun> DannyLilithborne, depending on the tone of the article, it could fall under G11 (blatant advertising/spam)
2008-02-02 21:07 < Darksun> But if in doubt, use prod or afd
2008-02-02 21:08 < Krimpet> or just find a sufficiently rougey admin. :p
2008-02-02 21:08 * Nakon coughs
2008-02-02 21:08 < Gwern-away> YIFF IN HELL FURFAGS
2008-02-02 21:08 < quanticle> Darksun: Are we still talking about that userpage?
2008-02-02 21:08 < Cyrius> uh
2008-02-02 21:08 < DannyLilithborne> Gwern-away: :o?
2008-02-02 21:08 * Nakon stabs Gwern-away
2008-02-02 21:08 * Nakon stabs Gwern-away
2008-02-02 21:08 < quanticle> Gwern-away: O_o
2008-02-02 21:09 < Gwern-away> er. I must've gotten a little \b\ on me
2008-02-02 21:09 < Gwern-away> I meant to say, good evening everyone
2008-02-02 21:09 < Darksun> quanticle, no, responding to DannyLilithborne regarding speedy deletion of an article about a non notable book
2008-02-02 21:09 < DannyLilithborne> mainly
2008-02-02 21:09 < quanticle> Darksun: Oh.
2008-02-02 21:09 < DannyLilithborne> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dukon_revolution
2008-02-02 21:09 < quanticle> Gwern-away: /b/ is the slum of the internet.
2008-02-02 21:10 < Nakon> DannyLilithborne: baleeted
2008-02-02 21:10 < quanticle> DannyLilithborne: Do the books actually exist?
2008-02-02 21:10 < ronabop> FURFAGS, TONIGHT, WE YIFF IN HELL!
2008-02-02 21:11 < Nakon> ronabop: go back to 4chan
2008-02-02 21:11 < bumm13> :/
2008-02-02 21:11 < Gwern-away> http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Image:4chan_b_motivation.jpg
2008-02-02 21:11 * quanticle washes the /b/ off ronabop
2008-02-02 21:11 < Darksun> Nakon, it wasn't A7 though :|
2008-02-02 21:11 < Gwern-away> ronabop: CHILDPORN? THIS. IS. \B\!
2008-02-02 21:11 < Nakon> Darksun: oh noes
2008-02-02 21:11 < DannyLilithborne> afaik the books were self published
2008-02-02 21:11 < DannyLilithborne> or someting
2008-02-02 21:11 < DannyLilithborne> ._.
2008-02-02 21:11 < kylu> your slashes are backwards, gwern
2008-02-02 21:12 < DannyLilithborne> Gwern-away: no links to the unmentionable site ^_^
2008-02-02 21:12 < quanticle> Gwern-away: Heh. I like it
2008-02-02 21:12 * Gwern-away reserves /s for actual useful stuff
2008-02-02 21:12 < Gwern-away> like pathnames
2008-02-02 21:13 < ronabop> Rules 1 and 2. :)
2008-02-02 21:13 < Gwern-away> Duko revlution could deleted under V; looks like the books aren't even written
2008-02-02 21:13 < Sfan00> Please do NOT post questionable links in this channel
2008-02-02 21:13 < Darksun> The Criteria for Speedy Deletion explicitly states that A7 shouldn't be used except for articles about people, organisations and web content. But feh, I'm too tired to care
2008-02-02 21:13 < quanticle> Sfan00: That link wasn't questionable.
2008-02-02 21:14 < Sfan00> It's a link to an attack site :(
2008-02-02 21:14 < Cyrius> huh, ED claims to be under attack by scientologists
2008-02-02 21:14 < quanticle> Sfan00: Hmm? What do you mean?
2008-02-02 21:14 < Gwern-away> Sfan00: yeah, because parody motivational links are so ATTACKy-delicious
2008-02-02 21:14 < kylu> there's an easy way to discover if a link is acceptable or not, y'know
2008-02-02 21:14 < Axeman> cyrius: you want to know what is actually happening?
2008-02-02 21:14 < Sfan00> I don't click random links from IRC
2008-02-02 21:14 < quanticle> kylu: Have it up on your screen while you manager walks in?
2008-02-02 21:14 < Cyrius> Axeman: some retards?
2008-02-02 21:14 < Axeman> sfan00: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Randompage
2008-02-02 21:15 < quanticle> kylu: And then see if you get fired?
2008-02-02 21:15 < Sfan00> but I thougt ED was a site that HAd attached Wikipedia?
2008-02-02 21:15 < Axeman> Attacking =/= raiding =/= trolling
2008-02-02 21:15 < Sfan00> ED is being attacked?
2008-02-02 21:15 < Axeman> ED trolls, /i/ attacks
2008-02-02 21:15 < Axeman> jeez
2008-02-02 21:15 < Axeman> what happened is there was a gigantic attack on scientology
2008-02-02 21:15 < quanticle> Sfan00: Yeah. By Scientologists. A lot of *Chan sites are getting hit too.
2008-02-02 21:15 < Sfan00> Who by 'Anon' or some group claiming to be in favour of the group Anon is protesting?
2008-02-02 21:15 < Sfan00> quanitcle: Wikinews?
2008-02-02 21:15 < DannyLilithborne> aww, poor ED
2008-02-02 21:15 < Krimpet> yay, two birds with one stone! :)
2008-02-02 21:15 < Axeman> by the Interwebs (4chan, 7chan, 12chan, 420chan, 711chan, partyvan, lulznet, ED, /i/)
2008-02-02 21:16 < DannyLilithborne> i'd feel sorry for them if they weren't so goddamn stupid
2008-02-02 21:16 < kylu> quanticle: I was thinking more post it and see if you get kicked
2008-02-02 21:16 < kylu> but that works too
2008-02-02 21:16 < Axeman> erm
2008-02-02 21:16 < Cyrius> DannyLilithborne: that's exactly my sentiment =)
2008-02-02 21:16 < Axeman> well...
2008-02-02 21:16 < Sfan00> DannyLilithborne: ED getting attacked is serious
2008-02-02 21:16 < NotACow> meh
2008-02-02 21:16 < quanticle> Sfan00: By 'Anonymous' - a anti-scientology hacking group.
2008-02-02 21:16 < NotACow> ED gets attacked on a regular basis
2008-02-02 21:16 < Axeman> ^ this
2008-02-02 21:16 < Sfan00> It means thiungs are ratcheting ;(
2008-02-02 21:16 < DannyLilithborne> gee, i wonder why
2008-02-02 21:16 < quanticle> NotACow: Right, but this time its rather a bit more serious than before.
2008-02-02 21:16 < NotACow> the antiscientologists are crazier than the scientologists
2008-02-02 21:16 < kylu> Sfan00: they got attacked a few days ago too
2008-02-02 21:16 < NotACow> quanticle: good.
2008-02-02 21:16 < DannyLilithborne> i mean, the ED staff are just such terrific guys
2008-02-02 21:16 * jeremyb wonders how axeman got back in
2008-02-02 21:16 < NotACow> quanticle: good riddance to the lot of them.
2008-02-02 21:16 < Axeman> why do you want ED to get attacked?
2008-02-02 21:17 < Sfan00> Axeman: Long story
2008-02-02 21:17 < Axeman> if you don't like their site, don't go to it... that's all
2008-02-02 21:17 < kylu> I tried to get on there for hours to see how well the site was holding up, but no matter how many times I hit refresh it never worked...
2008-02-02 21:17 < DannyLilithborne> because they're all retarded?
2008-02-02 21:17 < Axeman> I understand attacks, trolling, etc.
2008-02-02 21:17 < Cyrius> I don't want them to
2008-02-02 21:17 < Cyrius> I just don't care that they are
2008-02-02 21:17 < jeremyb> oh, dircbot
2008-02-02 21:17 < Sfan00> Also there's a long history rleated to sites that slander CoS
2008-02-02 21:17 * NotACow would love to see ED burned to the ground, the ashes buried, and the land salted
2008-02-02 21:17 < Axeman> the thing is, ED isn't the "enemy of Wikipedia"
2008-02-02 21:17 < Axeman> erm...
2008-02-02 21:17 * Krimpet has no problem with them going up in flames. :)
2008-02-02 21:17 < NotACow> i could care less if they'r ethe enemy of wikipedia or not
2008-02-02 21:17 < Gwern-away> Axeman: keep telling yourself that. they sure as hell aren't allies
2008-02-02 21:17 < DannyLilithborne> i don't care about that
2008-02-02 21:17 < Sfan00> After all you can;t expect to slander religon in the US and get away with it
2008-02-02 21:17 < Axeman> ED, /i/, what's left of the GNAA, lulznet, and the *chans are allies in raids
2008-02-02 21:17 < Cyrius> NotACow: and thrown into a lake, and then the lake thrown into the sun
2008-02-02 21:17 < DannyLilithborne> ED is criminally unfunny
2008-02-02 21:18 < NotACow> ED is unremittingly nasty, and their stance relative to wikipedia is really quite irrelevant.
2008-02-02 21:18 < Gwern-away> there's anything left of GNAA?
2008-02-02 21:18 < Axeman> okay...
2008-02-02 21:18 < Axeman> no, there isn't
2008-02-02 21:18 < Axeman> erm... ED is supposed to be nasty.
2008-02-02 21:18 < quanticle> Gwern: There's plenty left of GNAA.
2008-02-02 21:18 < DannyLilithborne> i'm unremittingly against anyone whose idea of humor is "lol butsecks"
2008-02-02 21:18 < NotACow> Axeman: i dont' care for that sort of "humor"
2008-02-02 21:18 < Darksun> I think that DoS attacks on any website should be violently opposed. The Internet should be a platform for free speech, DoS attacks disrupt this. Even if you hate the site, you should support their right to exist
2008-02-02 21:18 < NotACow> Axeman: it's fundamentally antisocial
2008-02-02 21:18 < Axeman> Their aim isn't like Uncyclopedia, where any person can read an article and understand it
2008-02-02 21:18 < Axeman> they're mostly writing their articles to humor themselves
2008-02-02 21:18 < kylu> ...okay, sorry, but how does one ally /i/ & the *chans?
2008-02-02 21:18 < DannyLilithborne> yeah
2008-02-02 21:19 < DannyLilithborne> that's why they suck so fucking hard
2008-02-02 21:19 < kylu> when /i/ started as a chan channel?
2008-02-02 21:19 < NotACow> Axeman: evidence that they should be locked up somewhere
2008-02-02 21:19 < Axeman> kylu: you don't
2008-02-02 21:19 < quanticle> Anyway, as Darksun stated, the internet needs to have rules of war. Trolling is ok, DDOS is not.
2008-02-02 21:19 < Axeman> that's the thing
2008-02-02 21:19 < jeremyb> Gwern-away: i've seen lots of ppl calling themselves GNAA recently (though not onwiki). no idea what criteria to use to determine if they actually are gnaa
2008-02-02 21:19 < kylu> okay, I was trying to figure out the logical issue there
2008-02-02 21:19 < Axeman> the only real rule is that ED, lulznet, *chans, and /i/ (mostly) never attack each other
2008-02-02 21:19 < DannyLilithborne> self-referential humor is hard to do well
2008-02-02 21:19 < kylu> <- posts on /cute/ :D
2008-02-02 21:19 < DannyLilithborne> random internet kiddos sure as fuck aren't going to succeed
2008-02-02 21:19 < NotACow> the internet is a haven for people with borderline personality disorder
2008-02-02 21:19 < bumm13> there are 15 levels of inner GNAAs within GNAA!
2008-02-02 21:19 < Axeman> they have a lot of the same userbase.
2008-02-02 21:19 < bumm13> ;)
2008-02-02 21:19 < Axeman> so they'll tend to participate in the same raids
2008-02-02 21:19 < Gwern-away> jeremyb: well, first they need to be gay...
2008-02-02 21:19 < Axeman> and my enemy's enemy is my friend
2008-02-02 21:19 < Axeman> so...
2008-02-02 21:20 < quanticle> Axeman: Not really. 'Doing it for the lulz' hacked 4-chan's
2008-02-02 21:20 < Darksun> jeremyb, there is no 'actual gnaa' really, just as there's no actual 'anonymous'. There are just people roughly aligning themselves through internet communication, there's no real structured organisation
2008-02-02 21:20 < quanticle> DNS
2008-02-02 21:20 < Axeman> quanticle: no
2008-02-02 21:20 < Axeman> XyriX was a retard
2008-02-02 21:20 < DannyLilithborne> if you think some badly drawn dancing animation with michelangelo's head slapped on is hilarious
2008-02-02 21:20 < DannyLilithborne> then please die for the good of mankind
2008-02-02 21:20 < Axeman> OH SHIT...
2008-02-02 21:20 < Axeman> OH...
2008-02-02 21:20 < Axeman> XtriX?
2008-02-02 21:20 < quanticle> Axeman: Wut?
2008-02-02 21:20 < Axeman> erm
2008-02-02 21:20 < Axeman> never mind.
2008-02-02 21:20 < quanticle> Axeman: With all due respect, I'm now even more concerned than before.
2008-02-02 21:21 < NotACow> mostly these people are bullies who lack the courage to bully people in real life, and so now bully them from behind a computer screen
2008-02-02 21:21 < Axeman> what I'm saying is that while a lot of sites unite under a common banner (lulz), some people will fraction off
2008-02-02 21:21 < Axeman> it's kind of like "freedom" or any other abstract concept
2008-02-02 21:21 < quanticle> Axeman: Heh true.
2008-02-02 21:21 < Axeman> a lot of nations want freedom
2008-02-02 21:21 < Sfan00> Well when they start to bully an organisation like CoS people take notice unfortunatly
2008-02-02 21:21 < Axeman> but then again, some people blow up buildings for their idea of "freedom"
2008-02-02 21:21 < Krimpet> NotACow, that pretty much sums it up
2008-02-02 21:21 < NotAMetroid> Axeman, and some don't want it for the jews!
2008-02-02 21:21 < Axeman> so, you know
2008-02-02 21:21 < quanticle> Axeman: Well, you could argue that *ALL* nations want freedom, for some definition of freedom.
2008-02-02 21:22 < Axeman> it's not like "Boss said raid site X, so I shall raid site X"
2008-02-02 21:22 < NotACow> MY nation wants the freedom to take your stuff.
2008-02-02 21:22 < Axeman> it's more like "someone posts site X and gives information, a lot of people get pissed at site X and raid them"
2008-02-02 21:22 < DannyLilithborne> rouge admin please erase [[Hario]] D:
2008-02-02 21:22 < Krimpet> people with too much time on their hands, riling people up on the Internet, who would never have the guts to as much as lift a finger at someone in real life
2008-02-02 21:22 < Axeman> or "someone posts site X and gives information, nobody cares enough to do it"
2008-02-02 21:22 < Axeman> Krimpet: who cares?
2008-02-02 21:22 < quanticle> Sfan00: Well, the funny thing is that Anon is actually planning a real-life protest at various Scientology related sites around the country.
2008-02-02 21:22 < DannyLilithborne> Axeman: i don't understand how anything you're saying detracts from the fact that ED is for fucking morons
2008-02-02 21:23 < NotACow> Krimpet: they do it because they have no control over their own lives; this is how they make up for it
2008-02-02 21:23 < Sfan00> quanticle: Yeah like that will actually happen
2008-02-02 21:23 < Sfan00> ;)
2008-02-02 21:23 < Darksun> I just love how the media portray anonymous as some kind of structured organisation
2008-02-02 21:23 < quanticle> DannyLilithborne: It is a site for morons, but that doesn't mean that you should try to destroy it.
2008-02-02 21:23 < Krimpet> Axeman: erm, when they're harassing folks in real life via phone and posting their contact information, it's a big deal.
2008-02-02 21:23 < Axeman> I could go on for 800 lines about the subtle differences and psychology of *chan, /i/, lulznet, ED, and every other force of Internets
2008-02-02 21:23 < Axeman> darksun: lol
2008-02-02 21:23 < NotACow> in the grand scheme of things, ED adds nothing of value to human discourse
2008-02-02 21:23 < DannyLilithborne> quanticle: i'm not trying to destroy them
2008-02-02 21:23 < DannyLilithborne> i will not, however, shed any tears if they do get destroyed
2008-02-02 21:23 < quanticle> Darksun: What media? There's been 0.0 media coverage of this so far.
2008-02-02 21:23 < Axeman> notacow: same could be said about anything
2008-02-02 21:23 < Axeman> Well.
2008-02-02 21:23 < Axeman> there's fox 11 blowing up vans
2008-02-02 21:23 < NotACow> Axeman: and yet it would be 800 lines of masturbatory whinging.
2008-02-02 21:24 < Axeman> notacow: but...
2008-02-02 21:24 < Sfan00> quanticle; Re Anon vs CoS Wikinews have coverage :(
2008-02-02 21:24 < quanticle> DannyLilithborne: Have you ever heard the phrase, "I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to say it?"
2008-02-02 21:24 < DannyLilithborne> anonymous news report was pretty funny
2008-02-02 21:24 < Sfan00> But yeah the anti CoS proetsts haven't reached the mainstream
2008-02-02 21:24 < Axeman> quanticle: Voltaire
2008-02-02 21:24 < Axeman> HACKERS ON STEROIDS ZOMFG
2008-02-02 21:24 < DannyLilithborne> quanticle: yes, and that's not my philosophy
2008-02-02 21:24 < quanticle> Sfan00: Right. I was talking about mainstream media.
2008-02-02 21:24 < Darksun> quanticle, it's been in major newspapers
2008-02-02 21:24 < Sfan00> It has?
2008-02-02 21:24 < Sfan00> Which ones?
2008-02-02 21:24 < quanticle> Darksun: Link?
2008-02-02 21:24 < Krimpet> I dealt with a woman on OTRS who was being brutally harassed IRL because her son (who no longer lived with her) had pissed off some 4channers a year before.
2008-02-02 21:24 < Darksun> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,325586,00.html
2008-02-02 21:25 < jeremyb> kylu: what's /cute/?
2008-02-02 21:25 < quanticle> Krimpet: OTRS?
2008-02-02 21:25 < Sfan00> And the protests stuff in particular, not the powder scare?
2008-02-02 21:25 < Axeman> for most intents and purposes, the faildozer (which is what I use to refer to the general ED/*chan/etc extablishment) is one entity
2008-02-02 21:25 < kylu> 4chan channel, jeremyb
2008-02-02 21:25 < Axeman> channel?
2008-02-02 21:25 < kylu> quanticle: OTRS is the wikimedia mail group
2008-02-02 21:25 < Krimpet> quanticle: WMF's e-mail response team
2008-02-02 21:25 < Sfan00> If 4chan is involvd things are going to get messy :(
2008-02-02 21:25 < Axeman> well, it's odd that you support getting rid of ED becaus they get rid of other sites
2008-02-02 21:25 < Axeman> :<
2008-02-02 21:25 < jeremyb> kylu: == /c/ ?
2008-02-02 21:25 < kylu> Sfan00: /r/ on 4chan's been involved for a while
2008-02-02 21:25 < Darksun> quanticle, http://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/story.html?id=261308 also
2008-02-02 21:25 < kylu> jeremyb: hai hai
2008-02-02 21:26 < Axeman> jeez
2008-02-02 21:26 < Axeman> actually
2008-02-02 21:26 < Sfan00> There is a difference between responsible protesting and outright harrasment
2008-02-02 21:26 < quanticle> Darksun: Thanks.
2008-02-02 21:26 < kylu> I post cute kittens. n.n
2008-02-02 21:26 < Axeman> pretty much all of 4chan sucks
2008-02-02 21:26 < Axeman> due to newfags, underageb&, etc.
2008-02-02 21:26 < kylu> and occasionally kasimasi and azumanga daioh pics
2008-02-02 21:26 < quanticle> Sfan00: Right. I don't think that any side is blameless in this fight.
2008-02-02 21:26 < Axeman> the win is over at 7chan, 12chan, 420chan, lulznet, 711chan, elsewhere
2008-02-02 21:26 < DannyLilithborne> Axeman: yes, this is true
2008-02-02 21:26 < Sfan00> Which is a shame
2008-02-02 21:26 < Axeman> But then again, it's like wine
2008-02-02 21:26 < Axeman> some wines are better than others
2008-02-02 21:26 < quanticle> Sfan00: However, I am siding with Anonymous because of my opposition to the CoS
2008-02-02 21:27 < Sfan00> as 'legitmate' protest would have been intresting to hear, based on reasoned logic rather than extremist progoanda
2008-02-02 21:27 < Krimpet> ...banning people for posting child porn is a _bad_ thing?
2008-02-02 21:27 < Sfan00> *propoganda
2008-02-02 21:27 < Axeman> but if you don't like the taste of it, doesn't matter if it's the best wine ever, or rotten grapes from behind the fridge, you won't like it
2008-02-02 21:27 < jeremyb> Darksun: well i assumed that but still didn't know if the ones i encountered were actually connected to established GNAA ppl or just got bored one day and decided to come by on their own and appropriate the name or what
2008-02-02 21:27 < quanticle> Sfan00: Propaganda, even ;_)
2008-02-02 21:27 < Axeman> The reason people on 4chan want pictures of 15-year-old girls isn't because they're pedos, it's because they're 15-year-old boys ;)
2008-02-02 21:27 < NotAMetroid> Axeman, did you just say 12chan was win?
2008-02-02 21:28 < Axeman> notametroid: not necessarily
2008-02-02 21:28 < Axeman> but...
2008-02-02 21:28 < Axeman> okay, I have to go AFK
2008-02-02 21:28 < Sfan00> quanticle: Besides why are people so anti-COS that they resort to criminal tactics like DDoS'ing a wesite?
2008-02-02 21:28 < DannyLilithborne> 15-year-old girls is pushing it
2008-02-02 21:28 < Axeman> tell me if anything happens between now and then
2008-02-02 21:28 < kylu> NotACow: wow, accusal. o.o
2008-02-02 21:28 < Axeman> AFK
2008-02-02 21:28 < kylu> err
2008-02-02 21:28 < kylu> NotAMetroid anyway
2008-02-02 21:28 < Krimpet> well, then they should get away from the computer and meet some females IRL then -_-
2008-02-02 21:29 < quanticle> Sfan00: The DDoS doesn't have anything to do with opposition to Scientology. For those script-kiddie types, DDoS is a valid form of protest for anything.
2008-02-02 21:29 < NotAMetroid> Krimpet, they're nerds with self-diagnosed asperger syndrome
2008-02-02 21:29 * kylu should go meet some females rl... how far away are you again krimpet? :)
2008-02-02 21:29 < quanticle> Sfan00: Just ask Estonia...
2008-02-02 21:29 < NotAMetroid> they will quickly fail at that
2008-02-02 21:29 < Sfan00> quanticle: Huh?
2008-02-02 21:29 < quanticle> Sfan00: A bunch of Estonian websites got DDoS'd last year, remember?
2008-02-02 21:29 < Sfan00> No
2008-02-02 21:29 < Sfan00> But oK point accepted
2008-02-02 21:29 < Sfan00> :)
2008-02-02 21:29 < quanticle> Sfan00: It was billed as the world's first cyber-war.
2008-02-02 21:30 < Sfan00> I thought that was Kosovo?
2008-02-02 21:30 * TheWeasel looks at the worst photoshop job evuh
2008-02-02 21:30 < Sfan00> Hi Weasel
2008-02-02 21:30 < Sfan00> I've been trying to find you
2008-02-02 21:30 < TheWeasel> shalom
2008-02-02 21:30 < TheWeasel> you have?
2008-02-02 21:30 < loader> Heh
2008-02-02 21:30 < Sfan00> Yeah
2008-02-02 21:30 < TheWeasel> I was at work all day.
2008-02-02 21:30 < TheWeasel> sorry
2008-02-02 21:30 < loader> About DDos
2008-02-02 21:30 < Sfan00> I need a German Speaker
2008-02-02 21:30 < quanticle> Sfan00: The attacks all came from Russia and people said that it was a Russian military operation. My explanation is that it was probably more like this CoS vs. Anon thing.
2008-02-02 21:30 < TheWeasel> Alright
2008-02-02 21:31 < Sfan00> You are aware of the coverage Wikinews is giving to the Anon vs CoS stry
2008-02-02 21:31 < Sfan00> ?
2008-02-02 21:31 < TheWeasel> no, not really
2008-02-02 21:31 < Sfan00> Wasn't there an ongoing German Govt investigation?
2008-02-02 21:31 < TheWeasel> But alright
2008-02-02 21:31 < TheWeasel> there still is
2008-02-02 21:31 < loader> Estinians had earnet that they tried to earn
2008-02-02 21:31 < TheWeasel> they're preparing a ban
2008-02-02 21:31 < Sfan00> Cna you dig up the sources on it?
2008-02-02 21:31 < quanticle> TheWeasel: The ban hasn't taken effect yet?
2008-02-02 21:31 < TheWeasel> The government documents?
2008-02-02 21:31 < Sfan00> How on earth can you BAN a religon?
2008-02-02 21:31 < TheWeasel> No.
2008-02-02 21:31 < kylu> quanticle: you know it was an Estonian who was just running a Russian botnet, yes?
2008-02-02 21:32 < DannyLilithborne> Sfan00: lol
2008-02-02 21:32 < Sfan00> I thought a BAN on CoS in germany was considered unworkable?
2008-02-02 21:32 < quanticle> Sfan00: Its not a religious organization under German law.
2008-02-02 21:32 < DannyLilithborne> history is full of examples
2008-02-02 21:32 < TheWeasel> Well, religions are materialised in institutions
2008-02-02 21:32 < Sfan00> And no-one should forget what happened the last time Germany tried to ban a religon :(
2008-02-02 21:32 < TheWeasel> and you can ban institutions
2008-02-02 21:32 < TheWeasel> That's different
2008-02-02 21:32 < NotAMetroid> Sfan00, if they could ban the Nazi Party they could ban the Church of Scientoloy
2008-02-02 21:33 < quanticle> Sfan00: Right, but you can ban the institutions of Scientology. And you can say that the current CoS doesn't satisfy tax law.
2008-02-02 21:33 < TheWeasel> back then Judaism wasn't considered a religion
2008-02-02 21:33 < NotAMetroid> there's a difference kinda between scientology in and of itself and the Church of Scientology®
2008-02-02 21:33 < Sfan00> How is that different from the way Scientology is currently 'not a religon' and thus in the eyes of some persecuted?
2008-02-02 21:33 < TheWeasel> You don't ban the state of mind, just the organizations
2008-02-02 21:33 < Sfan00> How is that not banning the religon?
2008-02-02 21:33 < TheWeasel> Because in your home you can do what you want
2008-02-02 21:34 < quanticle> NotAMetroid: Yes, in the same sense that there's a difference between Christianity and the institution of any particular church.
2008-02-02 21:34 < TheWeasel> this is only about banning organizations that engage in unlawful activity
2008-02-02 21:34 < TheWeasel> not about banning a religious community
2008-02-02 21:34 < Sfan00> but religons need common instiutions to function
2008-02-02 21:34 < Sfan00> as do 'religous communities'
2008-02-02 21:34 < NotAMetroid> <TheWeasel> Because in your home you can do what you want << aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanything? :)
2008-02-02 21:34 < quanticle> TheWeasel: What sort of unlawful activity. I heard there was some financial shenaniganry, but I don't know any specifics.
2008-02-02 21:34 < TheWeasel> well, if the religion status is a cover for a fraudulent and extortionist money-making scheme?
2008-02-02 21:35 * quanticle has to go make dinner
2008-02-02 21:35 < Sfan00> What real proof of that is there?
2008-02-02 21:35 < kylu> I thought it was the kidnapping and murder charges that got them in hot water?
2008-02-02 21:35 < Sfan00> Any relgion has to support itself somehow
2008-02-02 21:35 < TheWeasel> Yea, mostly about the pressure they put on people and the various ways they deceive people about their funding
2008-02-02 21:35 < TheWeasel> They hide it well
2008-02-02 21:35 < TheWeasel> that's why it's probably a fairly long and constitutionally nasty process
2008-02-02 21:36 < loader> Religion is opium for nation. (c) Lenin :)
2008-02-02 21:36 < Sfan00> Anyway Weasel, if you cna dig up the German Investigation stuff in connection with the Anon protests ( I assume there will be some in Berlin(
2008-02-02 21:36 < NotAMetroid> MARX
2008-02-02 21:36 < Sfan00> )
2008-02-02 21:36 < Darksun> Well done for totally screwing up that quote and attribution loader
2008-02-02 21:36 < DannyLilithborne> i thought marx said that?
2008-02-02 21:36 < TheWeasel> I don't believe Scientology is much of a religion, myself.
2008-02-02 21:36 < TheWeasel> But I don't do the defining.
2008-02-02 21:36 < Sfan00> loader: Ans communisum was a 'religon' to some of it's adherents :)
2008-02-02 21:36 < TheWeasel> can you give me a WN link?
2008-02-02 21:36 < Sfan00> *and
2008-02-02 21:37 < kylu> http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/%22Anonymous%22_plans_to_protest_Church_of_Scientology_on_February_10
2008-02-02 21:37 < TheWeasel> the infallibility of Lenin's interpretation of Marx was certainly handled in a semi-religious way
2008-02-02 21:37 < TheWeasel> okay
2008-02-02 21:37 * ronabop wants religious exemptions for extortion and fraud
2008-02-02 21:37 < TheWeasel> thanks
2008-02-02 21:37 < Sfan00> TheWeasel: Most recent story was : http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Envelopes_containing_white_powder_sent_to_Church_of_Scientology_locations_in_southern_California%2C_USA
2008-02-02 21:37 < loader> oh... google says that was Gegel
2008-02-02 21:37 < Sfan00> The German Govt's investigations should be findable on a search
2008-02-02 21:37 < TheWeasel> Does the latter have any connections with Germany?
2008-02-02 21:38 < Sfan00> I am interested in what the German's actually think is wrong with CoS
2008-02-02 21:38 < kylu> I boggle at the boondoggle of Google blaming Gegel.
2008-02-02 21:38 < Sfan00> TheWeasel: The last story relates to Southern California only...
2008-02-02 21:38 < TheWeasel> We want a discourse that is open to criticism.
2008-02-02 21:38 < Sfan00> But it I think has an Infobox which links to the earlier items
2008-02-02 21:38 < loader> <Sfan00> Yes, communism was religion
2008-02-02 21:39 < TheWeasel> Scientology attacks people personally if they voice criticism, and they act well beyond any sort of reason
2008-02-02 21:39 < loader> But for now it seems we have no any religion...
2008-02-02 21:39 < Sfan00> Well wouldn't you moan if your religon was attacked?
2008-02-02 21:39 < TheWeasel> Not by making baseless accusations in revenge.
2008-02-02 21:39 < DannyLilithborne> they also believe in a really crappy science fiction story made up as a bet
2008-02-02 21:39 < Sfan00> I mean if someone started accusing Christians of all kinds of false attrocities?
2008-02-02 21:39 * kylu 's religion gets attacked all the time, shrugs and goes on with life.
2008-02-02 21:39 < Darksun> Sfan00, that happens. Lots.
2008-02-02 21:40 < TheWeasel> The problem is that they do things that way concerning *any* sort of criticism.
2008-02-02 21:40 < loader> I'm for liberty of conscience
2008-02-02 21:40 < Sfan00> (ike the various myths toold about the Inquistion and so on)
2008-02-02 21:40 < Darksun> And it depends on the individual.
2008-02-02 21:40 < Sfan00> DannyLithbone: {{fact}}
2008-02-02 21:40 < TheWeasel> People get systematically intimidated
2008-02-02 21:40 < Darksun> There's a quote from the bible I'm struggling to remember, something about what to do if people attack, criticise and slander you for your belief in Christ.
2008-02-02 21:40 < TheWeasel> Open, democratic societies can only tolerate that for so long.
2008-02-02 21:41 < DannyLilithborne> Sfan00: ^_^
2008-02-02 21:41 < loader> God is inside of each man
2008-02-02 21:41 < Sfan00> How is what they belive any less valid than beliving God came to earth as man , was crucfied and ressurected?
2008-02-02 21:41 < loader> You can call it spirit or something else...
2008-02-02 21:41 < DannyLilithborne> Darksun: you mean turn the other cheek etc.
2008-02-02 21:41 < kylu> loader: and woman? :)
2008-02-02 21:41 < TheWeasel> The validity of their belief is notwithstanding here.
2008-02-02 21:41 < loader> <kylu> yes :)
2008-02-02 21:41 < TheWeasel> the constitution doesn't judge that.
2008-02-02 21:41 < DannyLilithborne> Sfan00: maybe Jesus needed a spaceship
2008-02-02 21:41 < loader> <kylu> are you woman?
2008-02-02 21:42 < Darksun> DannyLilithborne, well, there is that
2008-02-02 21:42 < DannyLilithborne> and the Romans needed ejipshun lazor beems
2008-02-02 21:42 < Sfan00> Well thier beliefs might influence thier methods?
2008-02-02 21:42 < kylu> by age, sure, by size, not usually.
2008-02-02 21:42 < loader> or maybe femenist one?
2008-02-02 21:42 < Krimpet> I saw a few of those "Anonymous" scientology flyers here on campus the other day. they're pretty much preaching to the choir, since I don't think there's any Scientology presence in this city at all, but there's plenty of 4chan users. :P
2008-02-02 21:42 < loader> :)
2008-02-02 21:42 < Darksun> Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake [??e?e? eµ??]./ Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you. (Matthew 5:11-12)
2008-02-02 21:42 * kylu can get away with shopping in the kids section of clothing stores still.
2008-02-02 21:42 < Darksun> That's the quote I was thinking of
2008-02-02 21:42 < DannyLilithborne> just saying... if things had gone a bit differently, we might have people taking "Discworld" as holy scripture D:
2008-02-02 21:42 < Sfan00> So investigation of thier methods is thus investigations of thier beliefs
2008-02-02 21:43 < Sfan00> DannyLilithborne: Some people do treat Discworld as Gospel :)
2008-02-02 21:43 < kylu> DannyLilithborne: imo, more beleivable.
2008-02-02 21:43 < TheWeasel> No
2008-02-02 21:43 < DannyLilithborne> ^.^
2008-02-02 21:43 < TheWeasel> that is a distinct matter
2008-02-02 21:43 < kylu> loader: pa ruuski?
2008-02-02 21:43 < TheWeasel> it is basically the difference between material and procedural law.
2008-02-02 21:43 < loader> [[kylu]]
2008-02-02 21:43 < loader> or how to do this?
2008-02-02 21:43 < TheWeasel> You can be justified all you want in your cause and still use illicit methods to attain it.
2008-02-02 21:44 < Sfan00> TheWeasel : You would be useufl in covering the German Investigation from an NPOV angle
2008-02-02 21:44 < kylu> how to do what?
2008-02-02 21:44 < Sfan00> :)
2008-02-02 21:44 < loader> i would like to get nick in wikipedia
2008-02-02 21:44 < TheWeasel> I'm not NPOV :-P
2008-02-02 21:44 < Sfan00> loader; You register
2008-02-02 21:44 < loader> yes
2008-02-02 21:44 < loader> no
2008-02-02 21:44 < TheWeasel> I don't know a lot about it anyway, it's quite secretive
2008-02-02 21:44 < loader> errr
2008-02-02 21:44 < loader> I mean her nick
2008-02-02 21:44 < Sfan00> Hmm
2008-02-02 21:44 < loader> :)
2008-02-02 21:44 < TheWeasel> I can see if I can get my hand on the Constitution Protection Report
2008-02-02 21:44 < kylu> oh... [[User:Kylu]]
2008-02-02 21:44 < Sfan00> Doesn;t the investigation publish reports?
2008-02-02 21:44 < Sfan00> Weasel: Thanks
2008-02-02 21:44 < loader> thx
2008-02-02 21:44 < loader> [[User:Kylu]]
2008-02-02 21:44 < Axeman> okay
2008-02-02 21:44 < TheWeasel> Well, not while it's ongoing obviously
2008-02-02 21:44 < Axeman> back
2008-02-02 21:44 < Axeman> what just happened
2008-02-02 21:45 < loader> ahh
2008-02-02 21:45 < TheWeasel> or the target would know what documents to destroy
2008-02-02 21:45 < loader> understand
2008-02-02 21:45 < Sfan00> I am sure there are public vs private reports ;)
2008-02-02 21:45 < Sfan00> Anyway I need sleep
2008-02-02 21:45 < Sfan00> later
2008-02-02 21:45 < TheWeasel> Blah, huge PDF
2008-02-02 21:45 < DannyLilithborne> gni
2008-02-02 21:45 < DannyLilithborne> ack
2008-02-02 21:46 < TheWeasel> I'm not employed at the ministry, I can't leak classified info I'm afraid :-P
2008-02-02 21:46 * Axeman , now confident that he won't be heard, makes rude comments about the size of Sfan00's wee-wee
2008-02-02 21:47 * ronabop wonders why Axeman knows, or cares
2008-02-02 21:47 < TheWeasel> darnit, I can't copy and feed it to tts, it's encrypted
2008-02-02 21:47 * Axeman is speculating
2008-02-02 21:47 < TheWeasel> anyway
2008-02-02 21:47 * Axeman please don't tell me if it's true or not, I honestly don't care to know
2008-02-02 21:47 < kylu> TheWeasel: print to PrimoPDF converter
2008-02-02 21:48 < TheWeasel> I'll just read it like that, it's ok
2008-02-02 21:48 < TheWeasel> Oh, I see.
2008-02-02 21:49 * Splixx uses a private webserver that uses PDFCreator
2008-02-02 21:49 < DannyLilithborne> Axeman: im tellllling.
2008-02-02 21:50 < Gracenotes> Axeman: omg slander
2008-02-02 21:50 < TheWeasel> the report quotes Hubbard "an ideal society is one of non-aberrant people, clears, who live in a non-aberrant culture (...) Maybe in the future, only non-aberrants will have civil rights. Maybe in the future the goal will be reached, that only non-aberrants can gain citizenship and profit from it. Those are desirable goals..."
2008-02-02 21:51 < Axeman> zomgz
2008-02-02 21:51 < Gracenotes> TheWeasel: and how does he feel about homosexuality?
2008-02-02 21:51 < Axeman> What is a Gracenotes?
2008-02-02 21:51 < TheWeasel> Homosexuality is like so gay.
2008-02-02 21:51 < Axeman> like... a pen that moves elegentls?
2008-02-02 21:51 < Axeman> lol
2008-02-02 21:51 < Axeman> at weasel
2008-02-02 21:52 < jeremyb> TheWeasel: is this a web page you're printing?
2008-02-02 21:52 < TheWeasel> I'm quoting and translating from a PDF file
2008-02-02 21:52 < Gracenotes> TheWeasel: hm, we appear to have an article on that :<
2008-02-02 21:52 < jeremyb> oh
2008-02-02 21:53 * jeremyb was thinking about the cairo PDF surface used in firefox on linux/windows and the built in to OS X PDF printer on mac
2008-02-02 21:53 < TheWeasel> they quote from internal memos that say they have to get close to the lawmakers and all
2008-02-02 21:54 < jeremyb> speaking of which... i wonder how they're dealing with the discrepency in UI between platforms
2008-02-02 21:54 * jeremyb inquires
2008-02-02 21:54 < TheWeasel> and there seems to be "enforcement" of "expected donations"
2008-02-02 21:54 < TheWeasel> that don't seem to be membership fees
2008-02-02 21:54 < Gracenotes> Axeman: I'm a musical ornament, hai
2008-02-02 21:54 < ronabop> Auditing Sessions
2008-02-02 21:54 < Axeman> In Soviet Russia, Wikipedia edits YOU!
2008-02-02 21:54 < Axeman> Gracenotes: oic
2008-02-02 21:54 < TheWeasel> and call Osama Bin Laden a psychiatrist.
2008-02-02 21:54 < TheWeasel> which is their strongest swearword.
2008-02-02 21:55 < Axeman> In Jimbonian Florida, servers use YOU!
2008-02-02 21:55 < DannyLilithborne> totally not getting old
2008-02-02 21:55 < Axeman> :P
2008-02-02 21:55 < cimon> TheWeasel: yes Osama is one, a very actional psychiatrist. You want to do a primal century or america scream, go ahead...
2008-02-02 21:56 < TheWeasel> "the purpose of ethics is to remove counter-opinions. When that is done, the purpose will be to remove concurrent opinions"
2008-02-02 21:56 < TheWeasel> (from some 1968 memo=
2008-02-02 21:57 < TheWeasel> It's fairly nasty, really
2008-02-02 21:57 < Nora> hi! I'm a real girl on the Internet.
2008-02-02 21:57 < Gracenotes> Nora: good day. How are you?
2008-02-02 21:57 < ronabop> [[R2-45]]
2008-02-02 21:57 < Gracenotes> ronabop: yes :P
2008-02-02 21:57 < Gracenotes> one of their more amusing procedures
2008-02-02 21:57 < cimon> TheWeasel: had dubya had any balls, he woulda met with osama way back when and parlayed Oliver North for alll the buddhist statues the Taliban demolished...
2008-02-02 21:58 < Nora> Gracenotes, hi, i'm doing well today :) Just filled my bra with kleenexes :)
2008-02-02 21:58 < Nora> altough they smell like vicks
2008-02-02 21:58 < Gracenotes> ah, good for you.
2008-02-02 21:58 < Krimpet> "MAKE MONEY. MAKE MORE MONEY. MAKE OTHER PEOPLE PRODUCE SO AS TO MAKE MORE MONEY." - L. Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 9 March 1972, MS OEC 384
2008-02-02 21:58 < TheWeasel> Buddhism is a false religion, so why bother
2008-02-02 21:58 < TheWeasel> only the splinter of Methodism he subscribes to is correct.
2008-02-02 21:58 < Axeman> >_>
2008-02-02 21:58 < Axeman> wut?
2008-02-02 21:59 * Darksun blinks
2008-02-02 21:59 < tomato> start key logger? wttf
2008-02-02 21:59 < Darksun> Is that the thing with certain brands of routers crashing due to a malformed dcc request?
2008-02-02 21:59 < wimt> Yep
2008-02-02 21:59 < Ashfire908> "Received a malformed DCC request from Nora."
2008-02-02 22:00 < AndrewB> Leslie_S: Scott5114 Sethant please connect on 8001 or upgrade your router firmware
2008-02-02 22:00 < Axeman> What happen?
2008-02-02 22:00 < Axeman> Someone set up us the bomb!
2008-02-02 22:00 < Axeman> okay, wait a sec here
2008-02-02 22:00 < Axeman> I'm going to have to go ahead and do stuff.
2008-02-02 22:00 < wimt> Axeman, same as yesterday. And as I said yesterday, you need to connect to freenode on port 8001 or fix your router :-)
2008-02-02 22:00 < Axeman> wimt: not my router
2008-02-02 22:00 < Ashfire908> interestingly, Axeman quit with "Success"
2008-02-02 22:01 < Axeman> >_>
2008-02-02 22:01 < Krimpet> iiiiinteresting...
2008-02-02 22:01 < Axeman> I did?
2008-02-02 22:01 < wimt> Axeman, well whatever the cause, changing port should deal with it
2008-02-02 22:01 < Axeman> okay
2008-02-02 22:01 < Axeman> let me do some stuffs
2008-02-02 22:01 < Ashfire908> after the dcc exploit with "STARTKEYLOGGER"
2008-02-02 22:01 < Darksun> But FrancoGG, you shouldn't have banned Nora! I know she sploited, but she was a REAL GIRLS!
2008-02-02 22:02 < Axeman> wait a sec
2008-02-02 22:03 < Darksun> http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-1068
2008-02-02 22:08 < Axeman> okay, what the heck
2008-02-02 22:09 < NCC-1701-E> ?
2008-02-02 22:10 < Axeman> DCC exploit, methinks? that what happened?
2008-02-02 22:10 < NCC-1701-E> ?
2008-02-02 22:11 < NCC-1701-E> Oh
2008-02-02 22:11 < Krimpet> Axeman, I can test to see if you're still vulnerable
2008-02-02 22:11 < NCC-1701-E> Yeah, DCC exploit
2008-02-02 22:11 < NCC-1701-E> Krimpet: Try me! </joke>
2008-02-02 22:11 < Axeman> krimpet: go ahead
2008-02-02 22:11 < Splixx> lol
2008-02-02 22:12 < Splixx> Futaba Channel got v& for scientology
2008-02-02 22:12 < Splixx> :P
2008-02-02 22:12 < Krimpet> I think you're good. :)
2008-02-02 22:13 < Axeman> oh shi-
2008-02-02 22:13 < Axeman> futaba?!
2008-02-02 22:14 < NotAMetroid> even the japanese are in on the attack?
2008-02-02 22:14 < Axeman> And the Vietnamese.
2008-02-02 22:14 < Axeman> You know what?
2008-02-02 22:15 < Axeman> I should get all the zombies of the Viet Cong that got killed in the Vietnam War... and have them fight against MySpace
2008-02-02 22:18 < loader> <Axeman> you don't like myspace so much